Alcovian Progress Board

Weekly review, all students on one screen

Did Alcovia conduct it?

Every promised touchpoint in the range, scheduled vs actually held. The tick marks the 95% delivery bar.

Missed sessions by type

Scheduled but never held. Each one is a promise to a parent we did not keep.

Did Alcovians like it?

Attendance is the first vote and the rating is the second. Ratings come from a one-tap prompt 30 minutes after each session ends.

Workshop soft-skill rubric

Cohort average per skill, by month (1-5). Darker = stronger. Scored by the facilitator, 11 skills.

How are Alcovians doing?

One row per student. Click a row to open that student below. Flags follow the thresholds in docs/04; three red flags make a student at risk.

GOODWATCHBEHINDBlank = no data (no wearable, or no item due in the range)

Cohort habits, week by week

Average across the selected students

Focus minutes / day
Quiz participationTasks done on time

Syllabus rigour, by student

Chapters due so far by the furthest rigour step reached. Step 5 = exam-ready (≥80% accuracy).

One student

The weekly review screen for a single Alcovian, compared with the cohort median.

Advisor inputs and automations

What the advisor controls. If these are low, the student numbers above cannot be trusted.

Advisor input health

Targets agreed with parents, and students logging chapter progress every week

Automated escalations

Fired by n8n. Resolved = the behaviour recovered (task done, quiz resumed, focus resumed).

Dummy data for 24 fictional students, generated by data/generate_seed.py. Logic mirrors sql/metrics/40_student_kpis.sql. All dashboards · GTM tracker